Charge Air Cooler CORE TYPES Guide
There are multiple different core types available on the market. Please see below to learn more about their advantages and disadvantages
|Cheap||Very poor cooling|
These cores are cheap to build and have very poor cooling efficiency. They exist in the market because they are very easy to braze. Any manufacturer with experience in brazing radiators can come out with this kind of charge air cooler easily. In short, these coolers look like charge air coolers but they cool very little. Buyer Beware!
|High pressure rating||Poor cooling efficiency if not engineered with enough tubes for the application|
|Better cooling than bar-plate when constructed for high boost pressure applications|
|Lighter than bar-plate|
- High performance diesel apps with high boost pressure
- Can withstand very high temp and pressure.
Very strong core, but depending on core configuration can have a lower cooling efficiency than OEM and Northern Hybrid. (see con listed above)
|Strong||Less cooling than micro-fin & Northern hybrid|
|Low warranty returns||Lack of aerodynamics|
- High stress
- High boost pressure
- Heavy off-road equipment
Aftermarket manufacturers have widely promoted the bar-plate as it does not require tooling or skilled brazing. In a direct comparison for the same size cores, the Northern Hybrid Core has a better performance in cooling efficiency. People like bar-plate because it is very strong and has very low warranty return rates. The burst pressure is very high in bar-plate, thus normal operation pressures never approach the burst pressure. However, bar-plate is very heavy, more expensive, and less efficient than some other types of cores. Bar-plate has different airflow characteristics: the bars typically have a flat face and do not have the aerodynamics of a round nose tube. Bar-Plate does have its place in certain high stress CAC applications, where its strength is an advantage.
OE Stuffed Tube:
|Very efficient||Most failures occur in four corners|
|Lower pressure rating|
- Stock automotive
- CACs that are not very wide/few tubes
Best cooling efficiency but when they fail it tends to be in the four corners due to thermal expansion and contraction.
|Best cooling to strength ratio||Not suitable in every application|
|Stronger than OEM||
Not as durable as bar-plate in large off-road equipment
|Reduced failure rate in four corners (compared to OEM)|
|Thicker fins than OEM|
- When both efficient cooling and strength are the priorities
- Most Heavy Duty truck & bus applications
Uses a combination of micro-fin extruded tubes at both ends of the core and stuffed tubes throughout the center of the core, effectively reducing the failure rate in the four corners. To achieve optimal cooling to strength ratio we use thicker fins than OEM.